[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3043b2ca-cfa2-db70-b24a-fc473139991c@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:29:45 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
will.deacon@....com, jhogan@...nel.org, paul.burton@...s.com,
peterz@...radead.org, arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 0/4] C-SKY(csky) Linux Intc Driver
Hi Guo,
On 17/10/18 02:55, Guo Ren wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 03:41:05PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Guo,
>>
>> On 16/10/18 15:08, Guo Ren wrote:
>>> This is about 13th patchset for C-SKY linux intc drivers and it should pair
>>> with 9th kernel patchset. Timer drivers are seperated according to
>>> requirements.
>>>
>>> This version patch improve the comment in commit-msg and move the
>>> changelog to the end with "---", so git am will ignore the changelog.
>>>
>>> Hope it could be merged into linux-4.20 and I'm very grateful to any help.
>>
>> I can't really see that happening, in all honesty. On its own, this code
>> is not very useful (it cannot compile standalone), and I haven't seen a
>> clear indication that the rest of the architecture code is going to be
>> merged for 4.20.
> Thank you very much for your frankness.
>
>> If the arch code is actually being merged for 4.20, then please add my:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
>>
>> to these 4 patches, and get the whole thing merged in one go.
>>
> Got it, thx for the conditional Reviewed-by.
The Reviewed-by is not conditional, and you can apply it right now. What
I meant is that I'm happy for you to get these irqchip patches merged
with the rest of the architecture code.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists