[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181017083126.GB22535@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 10:31:26 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Leonardo BrĂ¡s <leobras.c@...il.com>,
lkcamp@...ts.libreplanetbr.org, willy6545@...il.com,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Adds -Wshadow=local on KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 05:21:01PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> scripts/Makefile.extrawarn provides options for the target compiler (CC),
> whereas this patch adds -Wshadow=local for the host compiler (HOSTCC).
Aha, this wants to fix shadowing for the host tools, ok.
Next question: why not -Wshadow simply?
Also, -Wshadow for the target compiler is an extra warning (W=2). Why is
it enabled by default here?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists