[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181017104858.5f889634@bbrezillon>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 10:48:58 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"cyrille.pitchen@...rochip.com" <cyrille.pitchen@...rochip.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com" <Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP
SPI NOR flash memories
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:20:19 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com> wrote:
> Hi Tudor,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tudor Ambarus [mailto:tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:31 PM
> > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>; Boris Brezillon
> > <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
> > Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>; marek.vasut@...il.com;
> > dwmw2@...radead.org; computersforpeace@...il.com; richard@....at;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com;
> > cyrille.pitchen@...rochip.com; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI
> > NOR flash memories
> >
> > Hi, Yogesh,
> >
> > On 10/17/2018 10:46 AM, Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote:
> > > Hi Boris,
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@...tlin.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:00 PM
> > >> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
> > >> Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>; Tudor Ambarus
> > >> <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>; marek.vasut@...il.com;
> > >> dwmw2@...radead.org; computersforpeace@...il.com; richard@....at;
> > >> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com;
> > >> cyrille.pitchen@...rochip.com; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org;
> > >> linux-arm- kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com
> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform
> > >> SFDP SPI NOR flash memories
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:10:45 +0200
> > >> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:07:24 +0200
> > >>> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 02:07:43 +0000
> > >>>> Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> Actually there is no entry of s25fs512s in current spi-nor.c file.
> > >>>>> For my connected flash part, jedec ID read points to s25fl512s. I
> > >>>>> have asked my board team to confirm the name of exact connected
> > >>>>> flash part. When I check the data sheet of s25fs512s, it also
> > >>>>> points to the same Jedec ID information. { "s25fl512s",
> > >>>>> INFO(0x010220, 0x4d00, 256
> > >>>>> * 1024, 256, ....}
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> But as stated earlier, if I skip reading SFDP or read using 1-1-1
> > >>>>> protocol then read are always correct. For 1-4-4 protocol read are
> > >>>>> wrong and on further debugging found that Read code of 0x6C is
> > >>>>> being send as opcode instead of 0xEC.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> If I revert this patch, reads are working fine.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Can you try with the following patch?
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Hm, nevermind. The problem is actually not related to 4B vs non-4B
> > >>> mode but 1-1-4 vs 1-4-4 modes.
> > > Yes, that's only I have stated in my first mail that instead of 1-4-4 mode read
> > opcode is being sent for 1-1-4 mode.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Can you try with this patch applied?
> > >>
> > > With suggested patch, read for protocol 1-4-4 working correctly.
> > >
> > > [ 1.625360] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80
> > > [ 1.631094] m25p80 spi0.0: failed to parse SMPT (err = -22)
> > > [ 1.636661] 261 8c4c780 opcode(read:eb, pp:2, erase:d8)
> > > [ 1.641878] 266 8c4c780 opcode(read:ec, pp:12, erase:dc)
> > > [ 1.647200] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes)
> > >
> > > Without this patch, param_headers are getting freed and restoring previous
> > erase map i.e. opcode related to 1-1-4 protocol.
> > >
> >
> > Can you add some prints in spi_nor_parse_smpt() to isolate what's failing? We
> > should understand whether it's something wrong in spi_nor_parse_smpt() or the
> > s25fs512s smpt table does not respect the standard.
> >
>
> It's returning failure from below point in func spi_nor_get_map_in_use()
>
> /* Find the matching configuration map */
> while (SMPT_MAP_ID(smpt[i]) != map_id) {
> if (smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_END) {
> printk("%d %s \n", __LINE__, __func__);
> goto out;
> }
Can you dump the smpt array just before calling
spi_nor_get_map_in_use()?
> --
> Regards
> Yogesh Gaur.
>
> > Thanks,
> > ta
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists