[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ec51c2d-02f6-0988-0940-0ec31d22f697@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:49:40 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] ARM: tegra: Create tegra20-cpufreq device on
Tegra30
On 30/08/2018 20:43, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Tegra20-cpufreq driver require a platform device in order to be loaded,
> instantiate a simple platform device for the driver during of the machines
> late initialization. Driver now supports Tegra30 SoC's, hence create the
> device on Tegra30 machines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> index 67d8ae60ac67..b559e22eab76 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,10 @@ static void __init tegra_dt_init_late(void)
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC) &&
> of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,tegra20"))
> platform_device_register_simple("tegra20-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC) &&
> + of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,tegra30"))
> + platform_device_register_simple("tegra20-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> }
>
> static const char * const tegra_dt_board_compat[] = {
Not sure why you would do this if now the driver only works with DT. Am
I missing something?
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists