[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181017103926.okjwwinlsyegyrhu@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:39:27 +0200
From: 'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior' <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/mm/pat: Disable preemption around
__flush_tlb_all()
On 2018-10-17 09:54:38 [+0000], David Laight wrote:
> Can it make any sense to flush the tlb with preemption enabled?
it might. Usually it is disabled for other reasons.
> Surely preemption must be disabled over something else as well?
In this case it is due to the CR3 reload. I don't see anything else.
> David
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists