linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] clk: tegra: Add more rates to Tegra30 PLLX frequency table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:14:39 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] clk: tegra: Add more rates to Tegra30 PLLX
 frequency table

On 10/17/18 11:59 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 30/08/2018 20:20, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Add more predefined rates to the PLLX table, allowing to lower the rate
>> down to 312MHz. This gives more variations of frequency selection to the
>> CPUFREQ driver.
> 
> If these tables are pulled from some other NVIDIA kernel or a particular
> document, I always like to see a reference to where these came from so
> we can always refer back to them.

They are duplicates of T20 tables. But now this patch isn't actual and should be dropped because we will use other tables in the next iteration of the CPUFreq driver. Other patches still should be actual.