linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 05/11] dt-bindings: regulator: Change regulator-coupled-max-spread property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 16:36:21 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Maciej Purski <m.purski@...sung.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/11] dt-bindings: regulator: Change
 regulator-coupled-max-spread property

On 10/17/18 4:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 8:32 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/17/18 4:25 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 06:36:32PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> Redefine binding for regulator-coupled-max-spread property in a way that
>>>> max-spread values are defined per regulator couple instead of defining
>>>> single max-spread for the whole group of coupled regulators.
>>>>
>>>> With that change the following regulators coupling configuration will be
>>>> possible:
>>>>
>>>> regA: regulatorA {
>>>>      regulator-coupled-with = <&regB &regC>;
>>>>      regulator-coupled-max-spread = <100000 300000>;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> regB: regulatorB {
>>>>      regulator-coupled-with = <&regA &regC>;
>>>>      regulator-coupled-max-spread = <100000 200000>;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> regC: regulatorC {
>>>>      regulator-coupled-with = <&regA &regB>;
>>>>      regulator-coupled-max-spread = <300000 200000>;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt | 5 +++--
>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
>>>> index a7cd36877bfe..9b525b657fca 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/regulator.txt
>>>> @@ -76,8 +76,9 @@ Optional properties:
>>>>  - regulator-coupled-with: Regulators with which the regulator
>>>>    is coupled. The linkage is 2-way - all coupled regulators should be linked
>>>>    with each other. A regulator should not be coupled with its supplier.
>>>> -- regulator-coupled-max-spread: Max spread between voltages of coupled regulators
>>>> -  in microvolts.
>>>> +- regulator-coupled-max-spread: Array of maximum spread between voltages of
>>>> +  coupled regulators in microvolts, each value in the array relates to the
>>>> +  corresponding couple specified by the regulator-coupled-with property.
>>>
>>> Is this in use already? How is a single entry handled?
>>
>> No, it is not in use yet. Only some of the prerequisite patches were applied.
> 
> Please make that clear in the commit message.

Okay.