linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.21 04/16] mm: Introduce vm_map_user_ram, vm_unmap_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1051015468.759.1539788401096.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 11:00:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
        Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.21 04/16] mm: Introduce vm_map_user_ram,
 vm_unmap_user_ram

----- On Oct 16, 2018, at 8:27 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com wrote:

> On (10/16/18 14:30), Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > +void vm_unmap_user_ram(const void *mem, unsigned int count)
>> > +{
>> > +	unsigned long size = (unsigned long)count << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> > +	unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)mem;
>> > +	struct vmap_area *va;
>> > +
>> > +	might_sleep();
>> > +	BUG_ON(!addr);
>> > +	BUG_ON(addr < VMALLOC_START);
>> > +	BUG_ON(addr > VMALLOC_END);
>> > +	BUG_ON(!PAGE_ALIGNED(addr));
>> > +
>> > +	debug_check_no_locks_freed(mem, size);
>> > +	va = find_vmap_area(addr);
>> > +	BUG_ON(!va);
>> > +	free_unmap_vmap_area(va);
>> > +}
>> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_unmap_user_ram);
>> > +
>> 
>> Noticing this from Sergey's question in another patch, why are you
>> using BUG_ON()? That's rather extreme and something we are trying to
>> avoid adding more of (I still need to remove the BUG_ON()s I've added
>> over ten years ago). I don't see why all these BUG_ON's can't be turned
>> into:
> 
> +1
> 
>> 	if (WARN_ON(x))
>> 		return;
> 
> Given that this somewhat MM-related, I'd may be say VM_WARN_ON().

Good point, will do!

So I'll do one cleanup patch for vm_unmap_ram(), and I'll modify the new vm_unmap_user_ram().

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> 	-ss

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com