[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153978993915.5275.9461015919945429893@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:25:39 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Cc: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] clk: imx7d: remove CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for arm_a7_root_clk
Quoting Anson Huang (2018-10-16 23:12:04)
> i.MX7D uses virtual cpu clock of "arm" clock to be child clock
This statement is concerning. Why do we have virtual clks?
> of "arm_a7_root_clk" and it is with CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag set, so
> no need to add CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag for keeping "arm_a7_root_clk"
> use count correct, latest clock tree is as below in clk_summary:
>
> pll_arm_main 1 1 0 792000000 0
> pll_arm_main_bypass 1 1 0 792000000 0
> pll_arm_main_clk 1 1 0 792000000 0
> arm_a7_src 1 1 0 792000000 0
> arm_a7_cg 1 1 0 792000000 0
> arm_a7_div 1 1 0 792000000 0
> arm_a7_root_clk 1 1 0 792000000 0
> arm 1 1 0 792000000
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists