lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 10:13:23 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: twl-core: Fix section annotations on {,un}protect_pm_master

When building the kernel with Clang, the following section mismatch
warning appears:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3d84a3b): Section mismatch in reference from
the function twl_probe() to the function
.init.text:unprotect_pm_master()
The function twl_probe() references
the function __init unprotect_pm_master().
This is often because twl_probe lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of unprotect_pm_master is wrong.

Remove the __init annotation on the *protect_pm_master functions so
there is no more mismatch.

Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
---

Alternatively, I suppose that twl_probe could be marked as __init but
I'm not sure if deferral is possible or not (which I believe would cause
issues but not sure). I went with this more conservative approache but
I'm happy to respin if necessary.

Thanks!

 drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
index 4be3d239da9e..299016bc46d9 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ add_children(struct twl4030_platform_data *pdata, unsigned irq_base,
  * letting it generate the right frequencies for USB, MADC, and
  * other purposes.
  */
-static inline int __init protect_pm_master(void)
+static inline int protect_pm_master(void)
 {
 	int e = 0;
 
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ static inline int __init protect_pm_master(void)
 	return e;
 }
 
-static inline int __init unprotect_pm_master(void)
+static inline int unprotect_pm_master(void)
 {
 	int e = 0;
 
-- 
2.19.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ