[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ECADFF3FD767C149AD96A924E7EA6EAF8052436B@USCULXMSG01.am.sony.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:52:08 +0000
From: <Tim.Bird@...y.com>
To: <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>, <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <keescook@...gle.com>,
<mcgrof@...nel.org>, <shuah@...nel.org>
CC: <joel@....id.au>, <mpe@...erman.id.au>, <joe@...ches.com>,
<brakmo@...com>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <khilman@...libre.com>,
<julia.lawall@...6.fr>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
<kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<jdike@...toit.com>, <richard@....at>,
<linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC v1 06/31] arch: um: enabled running kunit from User Mode
Linux
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kieran Bingham
>
> Hi Brendan,
>
> I very excitedly jumped on these patches to try them out, as this is
> essentially something I was trying to do a few weeks back.
>
> On 17/10/18 00:50, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > Makes minimum number of changes outside of the KUnit directories for
> > KUnit to build and run using UML.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > Makefile | 2 +-
> > arch/um/Kconfig.rest | 3 +++
>
> But this file isn't present on v4.19-rc8
>
> It looks like the file is removed at f163977d21a2 ("um: cleanup Kconfig
> files")
>
> What version have you currently based these patches on?
> Do you expect to keep a branch somewhere that's easy to pull in?
>
> Please add me to the CC list as an interested party on later versions :-)
>
> It might be of interest to the automated testing mailing list too ? (Tim?)
I think this is interesting to groups doing automated testing of the kernel
(including myself) as another set of tests to run. Right now I don't see it
as having any special attributes related to automation. But I could be wrong.
-- Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists