| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <153980549223.5275.1496899374465535150@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:44:52 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-imx@....com, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...ux.com>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/5] clk: imx: add clock driver for i.MX8MQ CCM
Quoting Abel Vesa (2018-09-24 03:39:57)
> From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
>
> Add driver for the Clock Control Module found on i.MX8MQ.
>
> This is largely based on the downstream driver from Anson Huang and
> Bai Ping at NXP, plus the imx composite clock from Abel Vesa at NXP,
> with only some small adaptions to mainline from me.
Can you point to the downstream driver so we can know what small
adaptations were made.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/imx/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.c | 602 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/imx/clk.h | 36 +++
> 3 files changed, 639 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> index 4fabb0a..64e695c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/Makefile
> @@ -30,3 +30,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6SX) += clk-imx6sx.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX6UL) += clk-imx6ul.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX7D) += clk-imx7d.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_VF610) += clk-vf610.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_IMX8MQ) += clk-imx8mq.o
Please try to keep this alphabetical on CONFIG symbol.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..aadb523
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mq.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,602 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2018 NXP.
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Pengutronix, Lucas Stach <kernel@...gutronix.de>
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/imx8mq-clock.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/clkdev.h>
Are these two includes used?
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#include "clk.h"
> +
> +static u32 share_count_sai1;
> +static u32 share_count_sai2;
> +static u32 share_count_sai3;
> +static u32 share_count_sai4;
> +static u32 share_count_sai5;
> +static u32 share_count_sai6;
> +static u32 share_count_dcss;
> +static u32 share_count_nand;
> +
[...]
> +
> +static const char *imx8mq_ecspi3_sels[] = {"osc_25m", "sys2_pll_200m", "sys1_pll_40m", "sys1_pll_160m",
> + "sys1_pll_800m", "sys3_pll2_out", "sys2_pll_250m", "audio_pll2_out", };
> +static const char *imx8mq_dram_core_sels[] = {"dram_pll_out", "dram_alt_root", };
> +
> +static const char *imx8mq_clko2_sels[] = {"osc_25m", "sys2_pll_200m", "sys1_pll_400m", "sys2_pll_166m", "audio_pll1_out",
> + "video_pll1_out", "ckil", };
> +
> +static struct clk_onecell_data clk_data;
> +
> +static void __init imx8mq_clocks_init(struct device_node *ccm_node)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + void __iomem *base;
> + int i;
> +
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_DUMMY] = imx_clk_fixed("dummy", 0);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_32K] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "ckil");
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_25M] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "osc_25m");
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_27M] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "osc_27m");
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_EXT1] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "clk_ext1");
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_EXT2] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "clk_ext2");
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_EXT3] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "clk_ext3");
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_EXT4] = of_clk_get_by_name(ccm_node, "clk_ext4");
> +
> + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "fsl,imx8mq-anatop");
> + base = of_iomap(np, 0);
> + WARN_ON(!base);
And if that fails? return without continuing?
> +
> + clks[IMX8MQ_ARM_PLL_REF_SEL] = imx_clk_mux("arm_pll_ref_sel", base + 0x28, 16, 2, pll_ref_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll_ref_sels));
> + clks[IMX8MQ_GPU_PLL_REF_SEL] = imx_clk_mux("gpu_pll_ref_sel", base + 0x18, 16, 2, pll_ref_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll_ref_sels));
> + clks[IMX8MQ_VPU_PLL_REF_SEL] = imx_clk_mux("vpu_pll_ref_sel", base + 0x20, 16, 2, pll_ref_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll_ref_sels));
> + clks[IMX8MQ_AUDIO_PLL1_REF_SEL] = imx_clk_mux("audio_pll1_ref_sel", base + 0x0, 16, 2, pll_ref_sels, ARRAY_SIZE(pll_ref_sels));
[..]
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_CORE] = imx_clk_composite("dsi_core", imx8mq_dsi_core_sels, base + 0xbb00);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_PHY_REF] = imx_clk_composite("dsi_phy_ref", imx8mq_dsi_phy_sels, base + 0xbb80);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_DBI] = imx_clk_composite("dsi_dbi", imx8mq_dsi_dbi_sels, base + 0xbc00);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_ESC] = imx_clk_composite("dsi_esc", imx8mq_dsi_esc_sels, base + 0xbc80);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_DSI_AHB] = imx_clk_composite("dsi_ahb", imx8mq_dsi_ahb_sels, base + 0x9200);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI1_CORE] = imx_clk_composite("csi1_core", imx8mq_csi1_core_sels, base + 0xbd00);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI1_PHY_REF] = imx_clk_composite("csi1_phy_ref", imx8mq_csi1_phy_sels, base + 0xbd80);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI1_ESC] = imx_clk_composite("csi1_esc", imx8mq_csi1_esc_sels, base + 0xbe00);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI2_CORE] = imx_clk_composite("csi2_core", imx8mq_csi2_core_sels, base + 0xbe80);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI2_PHY_REF] = imx_clk_composite("csi2_phy_ref", imx8mq_csi2_phy_sels, base + 0xbf00);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI2_ESC] = imx_clk_composite("csi2_esc", imx8mq_csi2_esc_sels, base + 0xbf80);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_PCIE2_CTRL] = imx_clk_composite("pcie2_ctrl", imx8mq_pcie2_ctrl_sels, base + 0xc000);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_PCIE2_PHY] = imx_clk_composite("pcie2_phy", imx8mq_pcie2_phy_sels, base + 0xc080);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_PCIE2_AUX] = imx_clk_composite("pcie2_aux", imx8mq_pcie2_aux_sels, base + 0xc100);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_ECSPI3] = imx_clk_composite("ecspi3", imx8mq_ecspi3_sels, base + 0xc180);
> +
> + /*FIXME, the doc is not ready now */
What does this mean?
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_ECSPI1_ROOT] = imx_clk_gate4("ecspi1_root_clk", "ecspi1", base + 0x4070, 0);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_ECSPI2_ROOT] = imx_clk_gate4("ecspi2_root_clk", "ecspi2", base + 0x4080, 0);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_ECSPI3_ROOT] = imx_clk_gate4("ecspi3_root_clk", "ecspi3", base + 0x4090, 0);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_ENET1_ROOT] = imx_clk_gate4("enet1_root_clk", "enet_axi", base + 0x40a0, 0);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_GPT1_ROOT] = imx_clk_gate4("gpt1_root_clk", "gpt1", base + 0x4100, 0);
[...]
> +
> + clks[IMX8MQ_GPT_3M_CLK] = imx_clk_fixed_factor("gpt_3m", "osc_25m", 1, 8);
> + clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_DRAM_ALT_ROOT] = imx_clk_fixed_factor("dram_alt_root", "dram_alt", 1, 4);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < IMX8MQ_CLK_END; i++)
> + if (IS_ERR(clks[i]))
> + pr_err("i.MX8mq clk %u register failed with %ld\n",
> + i, PTR_ERR(clks[i]));
> +
> + clk_data.clks = clks;
> + clk_data.clk_num = ARRAY_SIZE(clks);
> + of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get, &clk_data);
Any chance to move to using clk_hw based provider and clk registration
APIs?
> +
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_AHB], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_133M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_NAND_USDHC_BUS], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_266M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_AUDIO_AHB], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS2_PLL_500M]);
> +
> + /* config video_pll1 clock */
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_VIDEO_PLL1_REF_SEL], clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_27M]);
> + clk_set_rate(clks[IMX8MQ_VIDEO_PLL1], 593999999);
> +
> + /* increase NOC clock to achieve best DDR access performance */
> + clk_set_rate(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_NOC], clk_get_rate(clks[IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_800M]));
> +
> + /* set pcie root's parent clk source */
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_PCIE1_CTRL], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS2_PLL_250M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_PCIE1_PHY], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS2_PLL_100M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_PCIE2_CTRL], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS2_PLL_250M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_PCIE2_PHY], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS2_PLL_100M]);
> +
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI1_CORE], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_266M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI1_PHY_REF], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS2_PLL_1000M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI1_ESC], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_800M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI2_CORE], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_266M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI2_PHY_REF], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS2_PLL_1000M]);
> + clk_set_parent(clks[IMX8MQ_CLK_CSI2_ESC], clks[IMX8MQ_SYS1_PLL_800M]);
Can this be done with assigned clock parents and assigned clock rates?
> +}
> +
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(imx8mq, "fsl,imx8mq-ccm", imx8mq_clocks_init);
Can you please add a comment indicating why this can't be done with a
platform driver, or convert this to be a platform driver?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists