[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvQ+rFa=XEuxLb=yPmtJE2QepBNjCVzjEY5urVzCaSF1tJBYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 21:40:53 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
lkcamp@...ts.libreplanetbr.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy6545@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Adds -Wshadow=local on KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS
Hello Boris,
> Next question: why not -Wshadow simply?
Good question. I can change it to -Wshadow and fix stuff for v2.
>
> Also, -Wshadow for the target compiler is an extra warning (W=2). Why is
> it enabled by default here?
The idea was to put it as default and fix all the shadowing warnings.
What do you think? I am open to suggestions.
Thank you,
Leonardo Bras
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
> Boris.
>
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists