linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 17/18] of: unittest: find overlays[] entry by name instead of index

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1539902796-8382-18-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:46:35 -0700
From:   frowand.list@...il.com
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 17/18] of: unittest: find overlays[] entry by name instead of index

From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>

One accessor of overlays[] was using a hard coded index value to
find the correct array entry instead of searching for the entry
containing the correct name.

Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
---
 drivers/of/unittest.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
index 1c2bd8503095..785985bdbfa6 100644
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -2178,7 +2178,7 @@ struct overlay_info {
 OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_phandle);
 OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_symbol);
 
-/* order of entries is hard-coded into users of overlays[] */
+/* entries found by name */
 static struct overlay_info overlays[] = {
 	OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_base, -9999),
 	OVERLAY_INFO(overlay, 0),
@@ -2201,7 +2201,8 @@ struct overlay_info {
 	OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_prop, -EINVAL),
 	OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_phandle, -EINVAL),
 	OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_symbol, -EINVAL),
-	{}
+	/* end marker */
+	{.dtb_begin = NULL, .dtb_end = NULL, .expected_result = 0, .name = NULL}
 };
 
 static struct device_node *overlay_base_root;
@@ -2231,6 +2232,19 @@ void __init unittest_unflatten_overlay_base(void)
 	u32 data_size;
 	void *new_fdt;
 	u32 size;
+	int found = 0;
+	const char *overlay_name = "overlay_base";
+
+	for (info = overlays; info && info->name; info++) {
+		if (!strcmp(overlay_name, info->name)) {
+			found = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	if (!found) {
+		pr_err("no overlay data for %s\n", overlay_name);
+		return;
+	}
 
 	info = &overlays[0];
 
@@ -2278,11 +2292,10 @@ static int __init overlay_data_apply(const char *overlay_name, int *overlay_id)
 {
 	struct overlay_info *info;
 	int found = 0;
-	int k;
 	int ret;
 	u32 size;
 
-	for (k = 0, info = overlays; info && info->name; info++, k++) {
+	for (info = overlays; info && info->name; info++) {
 		if (!strcmp(overlay_name, info->name)) {
 			found = 1;
 			break;
-- 
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>