linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] clk: imx: add imx composite clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 09:57:22 +0000
From:   Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC:     Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
        Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        "A.s. Dong" <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, Abel Vesa <abelvesa@...ux.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:COMMON CLK FRAMEWORK" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] clk: imx: add imx composite clock

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:51:35PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Abel Vesa (2018-09-24 03:39:56)
> > +       clk = clk_register_composite(NULL, name, parent_names, num_parents,
> > +                                       mux_hw, &clk_mux_ops, div_hw,
> > +                                       &imx_clk_composite_divider_ops, gate_hw,
> > +                                       &clk_gate_ops, flags);
> 
> Didn't I already review this? I'd prefer we move this to using clk_hw
> based APIs and then return the clk pointer if needed.
> 

Yes, you reviewed the v11, so you can ignore this 9th version.

I'll implement all the comments from you in the 12th version before sending.

I'll also switch all clk based register functions call sites
to clk_hw based ones.

Thanks

> > +       if (IS_ERR(clk))
> > +               goto fail;
> > +
> > +       return clk;
> > +
> > +fail:
> > +       kfree(gate);
> > +       kfree(div);
> > +       kfree(mux);
> > +       return clk;
> > +}

--