linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/cpufreq: Reorganize the cpufreq files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a662abc2-a44a-de58-3fec-76f477e3bfd2@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:13:42 +0200
From:   Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
        Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        ionela.voinescu@....com,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/cpufreq: Reorganize the cpufreq files

On 18/10/2018 12:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:54 AM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/10/2018 11:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:36 AM Daniel Lezcano
>>> <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It was suggested to set the scene for the PM components in the
>>>> scheduler code organization in the recent discussion about making the
>>>> scheduler aware of the capacity capping from the thermal framework.
>>>>
>>>> Move the cpufreq files into its own directory as suggested at:
>>>>
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/18/353
>>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/18/408
>>>
>>> Fair enough, but do we need to do that right now?
>>
>> I'm not planning to do more code reorg than this patch right now. Up to
>> you to decide if you are willing to take them.
> 
> The SPDX one certainly is applicable, but I'm not sure about the other one TBH.
> 
> Why don't you add the SPDX IDs to those files as they are for now?

Yes, sure.


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog