[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iHRECKosJWQZoaZa6QxAmW0MZLNPsFAbD21vW+kG0xJ-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 17:03:06 +0530
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To: evgreen@...omium.org
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
"robh+dt" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, swboyd@...omium.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add UFS controller
Hi Evan,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:55 PM Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> This change adds the UFS controller and PHY to SDM845.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> index b72bdb0a31a5..20b2c258816a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -808,6 +808,72 @@
> };
> };
>
> + ufshc1: ufshc@...4000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc",
> + "jedec,ufs-2.0";
> + reg = <0x1d84000 0x2500>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + phys = <&ufsphy1_lanes>;
> + phy-names = "ufsphy";
> + lanes-per-direction = <2>;
> + power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> +
> + clock-names =
> + "core_clk",
> + "bus_aggr_clk",
> + "iface_clk",
> + "core_clk_unipro",
> + "ref_clk",
> + "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
> + "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
> + "rx_lane1_sync_clk";
> + clocks =
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
> + <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_1_CLK>;
> + freq-table-hz =
> + <50000000 200000000>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <37500000 150000000>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <0 0>,
> + <0 0>;
> +
> + resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
> + reset-names = "rst";
> +
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + ufsphy1: ufsphy@...7000 {
nit: s/ufsphy@...7000/phy@...7000
> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-qmp-ufs-phy";
> + reg = <0x1d87000 0x18c>;
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
why do we need this clock-cells? ufsphy i think is not providing any
clocks. Is it?
Rest looks good.
Best regards
Vivek
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> + clock-names = "ref",
> + "ref_aux";
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
> +
> + status = "disabled";
> +
> + ufsphy1_lanes: lanes@...7400 {
> + reg = <0x1d87400 0x108>,
> + <0x1d87600 0x1e0>,
> + <0x1d87c00 0x1dc>;
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> tcsr_mutex_regs: syscon@...0000 {
> compatible = "syscon";
> reg = <0x1f40000 0x40000>;
> --
> 2.16.4
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists