[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181018125824.ms5zovmsnikv3bgt@treble>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 07:58:24 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Evgenii Shatokhin <eshatokhin@...tuozzo.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 02/12] livepatch: Helper macros to define livepatch
structures
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:11:53PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2018-10-17 13:17:56, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:37:03PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > The definition of struct klp_func might be a bit confusing.
> > > The original function is defined by name as a string.
> > > The new function is defined by name as a function pointer
> > > casted to unsigned long.
> > >
> > > This patch adds helper macros that hide the different types.
> > > The functions are defined just by the name. For example:
> >
> > On one hand, these macros are kind of nice, because they do the function
> > pointer casting for the user.
> >
> > On the other hand, they hide the field names, which hurts readability a
> > bit. For example, it would be easy to accidentally assign the wrong
> > callback function.
>
> I am not a big fan of the macros either.
>
>
> > Also, it's unfortunate that these macros are needed in the first place.
> >
> > What if we just change new_addr (and old_addr) to be 'void *'? Then the
> > macros wouldn't be as useful, and we could just get rid of them.
>
> Hmm, I wonder if any change make sense then. The above proposal might
> just exchange one confusion with another one:
>
> + I would expect that a variable called addr is of the type
> unsigned long
>
> + we would need casting when calling ftrace API
>
> + .new_addr = function_xxx looks a bit weird and it will
> be used many times in all livepatch sources.
Fair points. Instead of changing new_func to new_addr, how about we
leave it alone, and instead change 'unsigned long old_addr' to 'void
*old_func'?
That would give us consistent naming internally, while making the
external interface more sensible and cast-free.
We'd still have to cast when passing to the ftrace API, but IMO it would
be worth it.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists