[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hefcntl3u.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:55:49 +0200
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Philipp K <philipp97kl@...il.com>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [sound/i2c/cs8427] Fix int to char conversion
On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:47:55 +0200,
Philipp K wrote:
>
> [1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018, 15:46 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:33:02 +0200,
> Philipp Klocke wrote:
> >
> > Compiling with clang yields the following warning:
> >
> > sound/i2c/cs8427.c:140:31: warning: implicit conversion from 'int'
> > to 'char' changes value from 160 to -96 [-Wconstant-conversion]
> > data[0] = CS8427_REG_AUTOINC | CS8427_REG_CORU_DATABUF;
> > ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Because CS8427_REG_AUTOINC is defined as 128, it is too big for a
> > char field.
> > So change data from char to unsigned char, that it can hold the value.
> >
> > This patch does not change the generated code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Klocke <philipp97kl@...il.com>
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
> But at the next time, please put the relevant subsystem MLs to Cc,
>
> Oh sorry I forgot that. Just used the get maintainer script.
>
> and use the proper subject prefix (depending on the subsystem).
>
> What would have been the correct prefix in this case?
In this particular case, I modified the subject to
ALSA: i2c/cs8427: Fix int to char conversion
The subject prefix usage is case-by-case. Better to look at the
commits of the relevant file and just follow the convention in
general.
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists