linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 25/41] clocksource/drivers/fttmr010: Fix set_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181018175421.419733800@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 19:54:40 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Tao Ren <taoren@...com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Lei YU <mine260309@...il.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 25/41] clocksource/drivers/fttmr010: Fix set_next_event handler

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tao Ren <taoren@...com>

[ Upstream commit 4451d3f59f2a6f95e5d205c2d04ea072955d080d ]

Currently, the aspeed MATCH1 register is updated to <current_count -
cycles> in set_next_event handler, with the assumption that COUNT
register value is preserved when the timer is disabled and it continues
decrementing after the timer is enabled. But the assumption is wrong:
RELOAD register is loaded into COUNT register when the aspeed timer is
enabled, which means the next event may be delayed because timer
interrupt won't be generated until <0xFFFFFFFF - current_count +
cycles>.

The problem can be fixed by updating RELOAD register to <cycles>, and
COUNT register will be re-loaded when the timer is enabled and interrupt
is generated when COUNT register overflows.

The test result on Facebook Backpack-CMM BMC hardware (AST2500) shows
the issue is fixed: without the patch, usleep(100) suspends the process
for several milliseconds (and sometimes even over 40 milliseconds);
after applying the fix, usleep(100) takes averagely 240 microseconds to
return under the same workload level.

Signed-off-by: Tao Ren <taoren@...com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Lei YU <mine260309@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...rosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c |   18 +++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-fttmr010.c
@@ -130,13 +130,17 @@ static int fttmr010_timer_set_next_event
 	cr &= ~fttmr010->t1_enable_val;
 	writel(cr, fttmr010->base + TIMER_CR);

-	/* Setup the match register forward/backward in time */
-	cr = readl(fttmr010->base + TIMER1_COUNT);
-	if (fttmr010->count_down)
-		cr -= cycles;
-	else
-		cr += cycles;
-	writel(cr, fttmr010->base + TIMER1_MATCH1);
+	if (fttmr010->count_down) {
+		/*
+		 * ASPEED Timer Controller will load TIMER1_LOAD register
+		 * into TIMER1_COUNT register when the timer is re-enabled.
+		 */
+		writel(cycles, fttmr010->base + TIMER1_LOAD);
+	} else {
+		/* Setup the match register forward in time */
+		cr = readl(fttmr010->base + TIMER1_COUNT);
+		writel(cr + cycles, fttmr010->base + TIMER1_MATCH1);
+	}

 	/* Start */
 	cr = readl(fttmr010->base + TIMER_CR);