[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181018122155.4fe8dc01@lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:21:55 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel-doc: fix declaration type determination
On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 21:07:27 -0700
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>
> Make declaration type determination more robust.
>
> When scripts/kernel-doc is deciding if some kernel-doc notation
> contains an enum, a struct, a union, a typedef, or a function,
> it does a pattern match on the beginning of the string, looking
> for a match with one of "struct", "union", "enum", or "typedef",
> and otherwise defaults to a function declaration type.
> However, if a function or a function-like macro has a name that
> begins with "struct" (e.g., struct_size()), then kernel-doc
> incorrectly decides that this is a struct declaration.
>
> Fix this by looking for the declaration type keywords having an
> ending word boundary (\b), so that "struct_size" will not match
> a struct declaration.
>
> I compared lots of html before/after output from core-api, driver-api,
> and networking. There were no differences in any of the files that
> I checked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Applied, thanks.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists