linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: iio: ad7606: Move out of staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181018183740.ynxnplac6ca4wxf7@mwanda>
Date:   Thu, 18 Oct 2018 21:37:40 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:     Stefan Popa <stefan.popa@...log.com>, jic23@...nel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmeerw@...erw.net, knaack.h@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: iio: ad7606: Move out of staging

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 07:19:36PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 10/18/2018 02:55 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:10:32PM +0300, Stefan Popa wrote:
> >> +static int ad7606_read_samples(struct ad7606_state *st)
> >> +{
> >> +	unsigned int num = st->chip_info->num_channels;
> >> +	u16 *data = st->data;
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * The frstdata signal is set to high while and after reading the sample
> >> +	 * of the first channel and low for all other channels. This can be used
> >> +	 * to check that the incoming data is correctly aligned. During normal
> >> +	 * operation the data should never become unaligned, but some glitch or
> >> +	 * electrostatic discharge might cause an extra read or clock cycle.
> >> +	 * Monitoring the frstdata signal allows to recover from such failure
> >> +	 * situations.
> >> +	 */
> >> +
> >> +	if (st->gpio_frstdata) {
> >> +		ret = st->bops->read_block(st->dev, 1, data);
> >> +		if (ret)
> >> +			return ret;
> >> +
> >> +		if (!gpiod_get_value(st->gpio_frstdata)) {
> > 
> > This check should maybe be:
> > 
> > 		if (gpiod_get_value(st->gpio_frstdata) <= 0) {
> > 
> > (Or possibly not, I don't know the code very well).
> 
> gpiod_get_value() is only allowed to return either 0 or 1.

It looks like it can return negative error codes as well.

regards,
dan carpenter