[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181019070224.GB30556@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:02:24 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
mporter@...nel.crashing.org, Alex Bounine <alex.bou9@...il.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] PCI: consolidate PCI config entry in drivers/pci
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 02:07:04PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> We could add 'depends on HAVE_PCI' or something
> to guard it to avoid changing the logic.
I guess that makes sense.
> config PCI_ENDPOINT
> bool "PCI Endpoint Support"
> depends on HAVE_PCI # Is this correct ??
> depends on HAS_DMA
>
>
> or better to have 'depends on PCI' ?
It does not depend on the normal PCI support, so I don't think this
is the right thing to do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists