[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXLug_T4onn23JormmYZXDWVnEFYaoMzA90bpGFvk6Eow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:07:51 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alex Bounine <alex.bou9@...il.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: move bus (PCI, PCMCIA, EISA, rapdio) config to drivers/ v2
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:00 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:30:49AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Please use "git format-patch -v<N> --cover" to prepare patch series
> > for sending with git-send-email.
> >
> > "-v<N>" to prefix all patches with version number <N>,
> > "--cover" to have a "[PATCH 0/<M>]" prefix in the cover letter.
>
> We had that discussion before and I strongly disagree with messing
> up the subject lines like that. The git-send-email defaults are
> perfectly fine.
Can you please clarify what exactly that would mess up?
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst even mentions the tags
to put in "[PATCH <tag>]"?
Without this:
- It's hard to visually match your untagged cover letter with the
actual patches,
- Your individual patches lack the version info, so people cannot see which
version review comments in an email reply apply to.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists