linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tpm: tpm_i2c_nuvoton: use correct command duration for TPM 2.x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1539933995.19334.9.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Oct 2018 07:30:50 +0000
From:   "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:     "jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com" <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "nayna@...ux.ibm.com" <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
CC:     "nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <nayna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Struk, Tadeusz" <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>,
        "linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: tpm_i2c_nuvoton: use correct command duration for
 TPM 2.x

On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 10:14 +0530, Nayna Jain wrote:
> 
> On 10/17/2018 10:02 PM, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c
> > index caa86b19c76d..f74f451baf6a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_nuvoton.c
> > @@ -369,6 +369,7 @@ static int i2c_nuvoton_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> >   	struct device *dev = chip->dev.parent;
> >   	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
> >   	u32 ordinal;
> > +	unsigned long duration;
> >   	size_t count = 0;
> >   	int burst_count, bytes2write, retries, rc = -EIO;
> > 
> > @@ -455,10 +456,12 @@ static int i2c_nuvoton_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> >   		return rc;
> >   	}
> >   	ordinal = be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 6)));
> > -	rc = i2c_nuvoton_wait_for_data_avail(chip,
> > -					     tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip,
> > -								       ordinal),
> > -					     &priv->read_queue);
> > +	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> > +		duration = tpm2_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
> > +	else
> > +		duration = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
> > +
> > +	rc = i2c_nuvoton_wait_for_data_avail(chip, duration, &priv->read_queue);
> >   	if (rc) {
> >   		dev_err(dev, "%s() timeout command duration\n", __func__);
> >   		i2c_nuvoton_ready(chip);
> 
> I only have Nuvoton TPM 2.0, tested for that.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com> (For TPM 2.0)

That's what we needed as TPM 1.2 should be unchanged.
Really appreciate the quick response. I will rebase the series on to of
this patch. 

Thanks
Tomas