linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] mmc: mediatek: drop too much code of tuning method

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <513726cb-79e8-ca4d-e887-bf63c833260b@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Oct 2018 10:54:21 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        srv_heupstream@...iatek.com, jjian.zhou@...iatek.com,
        wenbin.mei@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mmc: mediatek: drop too much code of tuning method



On 13/10/2018 09:20, Chaotian Jing wrote:
> the tuning code is becoming more and more bloated, let's make the
> set cmd/data delay to inline function to avoid too much redundant code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 133 +++++++++++++---------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
[...]> @@ -1923,17 +1898,8 @@ static int msdc_tune_together(struct mmc_host
*mmc, u32 opcode)
>  	sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_IOCON,
>  		     MSDC_IOCON_DSPL | MSDC_IOCON_W_DSPL);
>  	for (i = 0 ; i < PAD_DELAY_MAX; i++) {
> -		if (host->top_base) {
> -			sdr_set_field(host->top_base + EMMC_TOP_CMD,
> -				      PAD_CMD_RXDLY, i);
> -			sdr_set_field(host->top_base + EMMC_TOP_CONTROL,
> -				      PAD_DAT_RD_RXDLY, i);
> -		} else {
> -			sdr_set_field(host->base + tune_reg,
> -				      MSDC_PAD_TUNE_CMDRDLY, i);
> -			sdr_set_field(host->base + tune_reg,
> -				      MSDC_PAD_TUNE_DATRRDLY, i);
> -		}
> +		msdc_set_cmd_delay(host, i);
> +		msdc_set_data_delay(host, i);

Put the clean-up before introducing msdc_tune_together, that makes the series
much easier to read.

Thanks,
Matthias