[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATc54ZMaKLzabW=NqCQ+WSr-3C7PNAGL6OmOnQf_kgOyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 21:56:34 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: mporter@...nel.crashing.org, Alex Bounine <alex.bou9@...il.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] arm: remove EISA kconfig option
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:10 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> No arm config enables EISA, and arm does not include drivers/eisa/Kconfig
> which provides support for things like PCI to EISA bridges, so it is most
> likely dead.
>
> If this is wrong we will be able to resurrect it easily by selecting
> HAVE_EISA for the right arm configs after this series.
What is your concern?
This absolutely looks dead to me.
> Suggested-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 15 ---------------
> 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index e8cd55a5b04c..e33735ce1c14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -165,21 +165,6 @@ config HAVE_PROC_CPU
> config NO_IOPORT_MAP
> bool
>
> -config EISA
> - bool
There is no prompt for this symbol.
Hence, there is no way for a user to enable this directly.
'select EISA' is the only way to enable it.
git grep 'select EISA'
gave no hit.
So, we can say it is dead.
> - ---help---
> - The Extended Industry Standard Architecture (EISA) bus was
> - developed as an open alternative to the IBM MicroChannel bus.
> -
> - The EISA bus provided some of the features of the IBM MicroChannel
> - bus while maintaining backward compatibility with cards made for
> - the older ISA bus. The EISA bus saw limited use between 1988 and
> - 1995 when it was made obsolete by the PCI bus.
> -
> - Say Y here if you are building a kernel for an EISA-based machine.
> -
> - Otherwise, say N.
> -
> config SBUS
> bool
I guess the situation is the same as powerpc.
The difference between arm and powerpc is the presence of help.
You fold the powerpc change in 9/9.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists