linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/15] Platform: OLPC: Move OLPC config symbol out of x86 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdNJwWbKfbsMQ2ZVmC=H3yPaLgxnE4Kstff9CYeopZJ7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:09:17 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        quozl@...top.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/15] Platform: OLPC: Move OLPC config symbol out of x86 tree

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:23 PM Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk> wrote:
>
> There are ARM OLPC machines that use mostly the same drivers, including
> EC infrastructure, DCON and Battery.
>
> While at that, fix Kconfig to allow building this as a module.


> -       depends on MOUSE_PS2 && OLPC
> +       depends on MOUSE_PS2 && X86 && OLPC


> -       depends on OLPC && FB
> +       depends on X86 && OLPC && FB

Looking to this I would rather introduce an idiom

depends on OLPC && X86

on the opposite you may do similar for ARM

depends on OLPC && ARM // or ARM64 or whatever it's called

thus, above would look like

depends on MOUSE_PS2
depends on OLPC && X86

and

depends on FB
depends on OLPC && X86

respectively.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko