Message-ID: <20181019153222.GA17444@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:32:22 -0600
From:   Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
To:     sboyd@...nel.org, evgreen@...omium.org, marc.zyngier@....com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] drivers: pinctrl: qcom: add wakeup capability to
 GPIO

Hi folks,

On Wed, Oct 10 2018 at 18:30 -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
>QCOM SoC's that have Power Domain Controller (PDC) chip in the always-on
>domain can wakeup the SoC, when interrupts and GPIOs are routed to its
>interrupt controller. Only select GPIOs that are deemed wakeup capable
>are routed to specific PDC pins. During low power state, the pinmux
>interrupt controller may be non-functional but the PDC would be. The PDC
>can detect the wakeup GPIO is triggered and bring the TLMM to an
>operational state.
>
>Interrupts that are level triggered will be detected at the TLMM when
>the controller becomes operational. Edge interrupts however need to be
>replayed again.
>
>Request the corresponding PDC IRQ, when the GPIO is requested as an IRQ,
>but keep it disabled. During suspend, we can enable the PDC IRQ instead
>of the GPIO IRQ, which may or not be detected.
>
>Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>
>---
>Changes in v4:
>	- Redesign to use PDC interrupts instead of TLMM interrupt
>Changes in v3:
>	- free action->name
>Changes in v2:
>	- Remove IRQF_NO_SUSPEND and IRQF_ONE_SHOT from PDC IRQ
>Changes in v1:
>	- Trigger GPIO in h/w from PDC IRQ handler
>	- Avoid big tables for GPIO-PDC map, pick from DT instead
>	- Use handler_data
>---
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>index 5d72ffad32c2..70b9178eba30 100644
>--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
>@@ -719,6 +719,12 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> 	const struct msm_pingroup *g;
> 	unsigned long flags;
> 	u32 val;
>+	struct irq_data *pdc_irqd = irq_get_handler_data(d->irq);
>+
>+	if (pdc_irqd) {
>+		irq_set_irq_type(pdc_irqd->irq, type);
>+		goto handler;
>+	}
>
> 	g = &pctrl->soc->groups[d->hwirq];
>
>@@ -798,6 +804,7 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>
> 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
>
>+handler:
> 	if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
> 		irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_level_irq);
> 	else if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING))
>@@ -811,9 +818,13 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
> 	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> 	struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> 	unsigned long flags;
>+	struct irq_data *pdc_irqd = irq_get_handler_data(d->irq);
>
> 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
>
>+	if (pdc_irqd)
>+		irq_set_irq_wake(pdc_irqd->irq, on);
>+
> 	irq_set_irq_wake(pctrl->irq, on);
>
> 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
>@@ -895,6 +906,83 @@ static bool msm_gpio_needs_valid_mask(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl)
> 	return device_property_read_u16_array(pctrl->dev, "gpios", NULL, 0) > 0;
> }
>
>+static irqreturn_t wake_irq_gpio_handler(int irq, void *data)
>+{
>+	struct irq_data *irqd = data;
>+	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irqd->irq);
>+
>+	desc->handle_irq(desc);
Do we see any problem calling handle_irq()?

Thanks,
Lina
>+
>+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>+}
>+
>+static int msm_gpio_pdc_pin_request(struct irq_data *d)
>+{
>+	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>+	struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>+	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pctrl->dev);
>+	const char *pin_name;
>+	int irq;
>+	int ret;
>+
>+	pin_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "gpio%lu", d->hwirq);
>+	if (!pin_name)
>+		return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+	irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, pin_name);
>+	if (irq < 0) {
>+		kfree(pin_name);
>+		return 0;
>+	}
>+
>+	ret = request_irq(irq, wake_irq_gpio_handler, irqd_get_trigger_type(d),
>+			  pin_name, d);
>+	if (ret) {
>+		pr_warn("Error requesting PDC interrupt %d for %s\n",
>+			irq, pin_name);
>+		kfree(pin_name);
>+		return ret;
>+	}
>+	irq_set_handler_data(d->irq, irq_get_irq_data(irq));
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int msm_gpio_pdc_pin_release(struct irq_data *d)
>+{
>+	struct irq_data *pdc_irqd = irq_get_handler_data(d->irq);
>+	const void *name;
>+
>+	if (pdc_irqd) {
>+		irq_set_handler_data(d->irq, NULL);
>+		name = free_irq(pdc_irqd->irq, d);
>+		kfree(name);
>+	}
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int msm_gpio_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
>+{
>+	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>+
>+	if (gpiochip_lock_as_irq(gc, irqd_to_hwirq(d))) {
>+		dev_err(gc->parent, "unable to lock HW IRQ %lu for IRQ\n",
>+			irqd_to_hwirq(d));
>+		return -EINVAL;
>+	}
>+
>+	return msm_gpio_pdc_pin_request(d);
>+}
>+
>+static void msm_gpio_irq_relres(struct irq_data *d)
>+{
>+	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
>+
>+	msm_gpio_pdc_pin_release(d);
>+	gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(gc, irqd_to_hwirq(d));
>+}
>+
> static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl)
> {
> 	struct gpio_chip *chip;
>@@ -919,6 +1007,8 @@ static int msm_gpio_init(struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl)
> 	pctrl->irq_chip.irq_ack = msm_gpio_irq_ack;
> 	pctrl->irq_chip.irq_set_type = msm_gpio_irq_set_type;
> 	pctrl->irq_chip.irq_set_wake = msm_gpio_irq_set_wake;
>+	pctrl->irq_chip.irq_request_resources = msm_gpio_irq_reqres;
>+	pctrl->irq_chip.irq_release_resources = msm_gpio_irq_relres;
>
> 	ret = gpiochip_add_data(&pctrl->chip, pctrl);
> 	if (ret) {
>@@ -1072,4 +1162,3 @@ int msm_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 	return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(msm_pinctrl_remove);
>-
>--
>The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
>a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists