[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17323.1539964061@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:47:41 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] uapi: deprecate STATX_ALL
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> What is misleading about this?
The manpage says:
STATX_ALL [All currently available fields]
> If you feel confused by this comment, then maybe I should just drop that part.
I think that would be better. Don't try to give it a definition.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists