linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/6] mm/hmm: fix race between hmm_mirror_unregister() and mmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Oct 2018 12:04:39 -0400
From:   jglisse@...hat.com
To:     linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] mm/hmm: fix race between hmm_mirror_unregister() and mmu_notifier callback

From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>

In hmm_mirror_unregister(), mm->hmm is set to NULL and then
mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release() is called. That creates a small
window where mmu_notifier can call mmu_notifier_ops with mm->hmm equal
to NULL. Fix this by first unregistering mmu notifier callbacks and
then setting mm->hmm to NULL.

Similarly in hmm_register(), set mm->hmm before registering mmu_notifier
callbacks so callback functions always see mm->hmm set.

Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
 mm/hmm.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index 9a068a1da487..a16678d08127 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -91,16 +91,6 @@ static struct hmm *hmm_register(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	spin_lock_init(&hmm->lock);
 	hmm->mm = mm;
 
-	/*
-	 * We should only get here if hold the mmap_sem in write mode ie on
-	 * registration of first mirror through hmm_mirror_register()
-	 */
-	hmm->mmu_notifier.ops = &hmm_mmu_notifier_ops;
-	if (__mmu_notifier_register(&hmm->mmu_notifier, mm)) {
-		kfree(hmm);
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
 	spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
 	if (!mm->hmm)
 		mm->hmm = hmm;
@@ -108,12 +98,27 @@ static struct hmm *hmm_register(struct mm_struct *mm)
 		cleanup = true;
 	spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
 
-	if (cleanup) {
-		mmu_notifier_unregister(&hmm->mmu_notifier, mm);
-		kfree(hmm);
-	}
+	if (cleanup)
+		goto error;
+
+	/*
+	 * We should only get here if hold the mmap_sem in write mode ie on
+	 * registration of first mirror through hmm_mirror_register()
+	 */
+	hmm->mmu_notifier.ops = &hmm_mmu_notifier_ops;
+	if (__mmu_notifier_register(&hmm->mmu_notifier, mm))
+		goto error_mm;
 
 	return mm->hmm;
+
+error_mm:
+	spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
+	if (mm->hmm == hmm)
+		mm->hmm = NULL;
+	spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
+error:
+	kfree(hmm);
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 void hmm_mm_destroy(struct mm_struct *mm)
@@ -278,12 +283,13 @@ void hmm_mirror_unregister(struct hmm_mirror *mirror)
 	if (!should_unregister || mm == NULL)
 		return;
 
+	mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release(&hmm->mmu_notifier, mm);
+
 	spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
 	if (mm->hmm == hmm)
 		mm->hmm = NULL;
 	spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
 
-	mmu_notifier_unregister_no_release(&hmm->mmu_notifier, mm);
 	kfree(hmm);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_mirror_unregister);
-- 
2.17.2