lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 Oct 2018 20:30:57 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Peng Hao <penghao122@...a.com.cn>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]  sched/fair : modify comment of fbq_type description

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:44:54PM -0400, Peng Hao wrote:
> 
> From: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
> 
> for type 'all', the comment 'there is no distinction' is vague.
> make it clearer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <peng.hao2@....com.cn>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index f808ddf..3a0543f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -8304,7 +8304,7 @@ static struct rq *find_busiest_queue(struct lb_env *env,
>  		 * We classify groups/runqueues into three groups:
>  		 *  - regular: there are !numa tasks
>  		 *  - remote:  there are numa tasks that run on the 'wrong' node
> -		 *  - all:     there is no distinction
> +		 *  - all:     there are numa tasks that run on the 'right' node

No, that is actively wrong. Both the previous cases inlcude that.

If anything, it should be: all tasks are numa tasks and run on the
'right' node.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ