[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29902.1539988579@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 23:36:19 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mszeredi@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/34] teach move_mount(2) to work with OPEN_TREE_CLONE [ver #12]
Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@...il.com> wrote:
> # open_tree_clone 3</mnt 3 sh
> # cd /proc/self/fd/3
> # mount --move . /mnt
> [ 41.747831] mnt_flags=1020 umount=0
> # cd /
> # umount /mnt
> umount: /mnt: target is busy
>
> ^ a newly introduced bug? I do not remember having this problem before.
The reason EBUSY is returned is because propagate_mount_busy() is called by
do_umount() with refcnt == 2, but mnt_count == 3:
umount-3577 M=f8898a34 u=3 0x555 sp=__x64_sys_umount+0x12/0x15
the trace line being added here:
if (!propagate_mount_busy(mnt, 2)) {
if (!list_empty(&mnt->mnt_list))
umount_tree(mnt, UMOUNT_PROPAGATE|UMOUNT_SYNC);
retval = 0;
} else {
trace_mnt_count(mnt, mnt->mnt_id,
atomic_read(&mnt->mnt_count),
0x555, __builtin_return_address(0));
}
The busy evaluation is a result of this check:
if (!list_empty(&mnt->mnt_mounts) || do_refcount_check(mnt, refcnt))
in propagate_mount_busy().
The problem apparently being that mnt_count counts both refs from mountings
and refs from other sources, such as file descriptors or pathwalk.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists