[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADvQ+rHRaoAME=tJBzkTg74K237SNm2hFN8mxFemDwa3CKQibA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 23:50:57 -0300
From: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, lkcamp@...ts.libreplanetbr.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy6545@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Adds -Wshadow=local on KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:42 PM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
> Adding -Wshadow to KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS emits another warning in Kconfig.
> Of course, it is easy to fix.
For v2, I already replaced '-Wshadow=local' for '-Wshadow' and fixed this
warning.
> But, I just started to think this option is a kind of harsh...
The v2 it's almost done. You think it will be useful, or should I drop it?
Regards,
Leonardo Bras
Powered by blists - more mailing lists