[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181020110819.1576-2-straube.linux@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 13:08:18 +0200
From: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] staging: rtl8188eu: rename variable Max_spatial_stream - style
Rename the variable Max_spatial_stream to avoid CamelCase.
Max_spatial_stream -> max_spatial_stream
Signed-off-by: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm_hwconfig.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm_hwconfig.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm_hwconfig.c
index 0c034b19d3dd..d7bdbb141b2b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm_hwconfig.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/odm_hwconfig.c
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static void odm_RxPhyStatus92CSeries_Parsing(struct odm_dm_struct *dm_odm,
struct odm_per_pkt_info *pPktinfo)
{
struct sw_ant_switch *pDM_SWAT_Table = &dm_odm->DM_SWAT_Table;
- u8 i, Max_spatial_stream;
+ u8 i, max_spatial_stream;
s8 rx_pwr[4], rx_pwr_all = 0;
u8 EVM, PWDB_ALL = 0, PWDB_ALL_BT;
u8 RSSI, total_rssi = 0;
@@ -215,11 +215,11 @@ static void odm_RxPhyStatus92CSeries_Parsing(struct odm_dm_struct *dm_odm,
/* (3)EVM of HT rate */
if (pPktinfo->Rate >= DESC92C_RATEMCS8 && pPktinfo->Rate <= DESC92C_RATEMCS15)
- Max_spatial_stream = 2; /* both spatial stream make sense */
+ max_spatial_stream = 2; /* both spatial stream make sense */
else
- Max_spatial_stream = 1; /* only spatial stream 1 makes sense */
+ max_spatial_stream = 1; /* only spatial stream 1 makes sense */
- for (i = 0; i < Max_spatial_stream; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < max_spatial_stream; i++) {
/* Do not use shift operation like "rx_evmX >>= 1" because the compilor of free build environment */
/* fill most significant bit to "zero" when doing shifting operation which may change a negative */
/* value to positive one, then the dbm value (which is supposed to be negative) is not correct anymore. */
--
2.19.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists