linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] leds: upboard: Add LED support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcOxBFvr4MSd=y61t7eFAv=9pFzMsumd7=2jbW3aZ4O4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 Oct 2018 14:17:58 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     "Dan O'Donovan" <dan@...tex.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        carlos.iglesias@...tex.com, Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] leds: upboard: Add LED support

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:27 PM Dan O'Donovan <dan@...tex.com> wrote:
>
> From: Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>
>
> Allow userspace to use the on-board LEDs as "upboard:<color>:".



> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/leds.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/upboard.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>

For better maintenance keep this ordered.

> +       adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> +       if (!adev || strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "AANT0F01"))
> +               return -ENODEV;

Why do you need this part?

> +       if (led_index >= ARRAY_SIZE(upboard_led_names))
> +               return -EINVAL;

> +       if (!dev->parent)
> +               return -EINVAL;

...I think this check will cover cases when driver is being probed standalone.
Otherwise it's caller's responsibility not to instantiate it if
platform doesn't have this LED feature.

> +       regmap = dev_get_regmap(dev->parent, NULL);
> +       if (!regmap)
> +               return -EINVAL;

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko