[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181022110919.2b44f0e6@bbrezillon>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:09:19 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
"marek.vasut@...il.com" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
"cyrille.pitchen@...rochip.com" <cyrille.pitchen@...rochip.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com" <Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP
SPI NOR flash memories
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:32:21 +0000
Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com> wrote:
> HI,
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@...tlin.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:32 PM
> > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com>
> > Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...ev4u.fr>; Tudor Ambarus
> > <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>; marek.vasut@...il.com;
> > dwmw2@...radead.org; computersforpeace@...il.com; richard@....at;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com;
> > cyrille.pitchen@...rochip.com; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com; Mark Brown
> > <broonie@...nel.org>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: spi-nor: add support to non-uniform SFDP SPI
> > NOR flash memories
> >
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 06:04:13 +0000
> > Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@....com> wrote:
> >
> > > -static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const
> > > u32 *smpt)
> > > +static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct spi_nor *nor, const
> > > +u32 *smpt, u32 smpt_len)
> > > {
> > > const u32 *ret = NULL;
> > > - u32 i, addr;
> > > + u32 i, addr, nmaps;
> > > int err;
> > > u8 addr_width, read_opcode, read_dummy;
> > > u8 read_data_mask, data_byte, map_id;
> > > + bool map_id_is_valid = false;
> > >
> > > addr_width = nor->addr_width;
> > > read_dummy = nor->read_dummy;
> > > read_opcode = nor->read_opcode;
> > >
> > > + for (i = 0; i<smpt_len; i++)
> > > + pr_info("%s:%i smpt[%d]=%08x\n", __func__, __LINE__,
> > > + i, smpt[i]);
> > > +
> > > map_id = 0;
> > > - i = 0;
> > > /* Determine if there are any optional Detection Command Descriptors */
> > > - while (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP)) {
> > > + for (i = 0; i< smpt_len; i++) {
> > > + if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))
> > > + break;
> > > +
> > > read_data_mask = SMPT_CMD_READ_DATA(smpt[i]);
> > > nor->addr_width = spi_nor_smpt_addr_width(nor, smpt[i]);
> > > nor->read_dummy = spi_nor_smpt_read_dummy(nor,
> > > smpt[i]);
> >
> > Could you also print the ->addr_width, ->read_dummy and ->read_opcode here?
> >
> It didn't showing any print messages here, did above line " if (!(smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))" also needs to be changes to " if ((smpt[i] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))"?
Yes.
>
> Below is the log, with the suggested change of modifying as
> > + for (nmaps = 0; nmaps< smpt_len; nmaps++) {
> > + if((smpt[nmaps] & SMPT_DESC_TYPE_MAP))
>
> [ 1.625992] m25p80 spi0.0: found s25fl512s, expected m25p80
> [ 1.631681] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[0]=08ff65fc
> [ 1.636988] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[1]=00000004
> [ 1.642292] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[2]=04ff65fc
> [ 1.647596] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[3]=00000002
> [ 1.652898] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[4]=02ff65fd
> [ 1.658200] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[5]=00000004
> [ 1.663503] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[6]=ff0201fe
> [ 1.668806] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[7]=00007ff1
> [ 1.674108] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[8]=00037ff4
> [ 1.679412] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[9]=03fbfff4
> [ 1.684715] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[10]=ff0203fe
> [ 1.690105] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[11]=03fbfff4
> [ 1.695495] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[12]=00037ff4
> [ 1.700886] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[13]=00007ff1
> [ 1.706275] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[14]=ff0005ff
> [ 1.711664] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2880 smpt[15]=03fffff4
> [ 1.717053] spi_nor_get_map_in_use:2910 NO map_id
> [ 1.721777] m25p80 spi0.0: s25fl512s (65536 Kbytes)
>
> Didn't throw any return error.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Yogesh Gaur
>
>
> > > @@ -2894,18 +2900,35 @@ static const u32 *spi_nor_get_map_in_use(struct
> > spi_nor *nor, const u32 *smpt)
> > > * Configuration that is currently in use.
> > > */
> > > map_id = map_id << 1 | !!(data_byte & read_data_mask);
> > > + map_id_is_valid = true;
> > > i = i + 2;
> > > }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists