[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181022093226.nn5h7ohuzcyeezyt@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:32:26 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Daniel Wang <wonderfly@...gle.com>
Cc: sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, byungchul.park@....com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, hannes@...xchg.org, jack@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, mhocko@...nel.org, pavel@....cz,
penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp, peterz@...radead.org,
tj@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: 4.14 backport request for dbdda842fe96f: "printk: Add console
owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes"
On Sun 2018-10-21 11:09:22, Daniel Wang wrote:
> Just got back from vacation. Thanks for the continued discussion. Just so
> I understand the current state. Looks like we've got a pretty good explanation
> of what's going on (though not completely sure), and backporting Steven's
> patches is still the way to go? I see that Sergey had sent an RFC series
> for similar things. Are those trying to solve the deadlock problem in a
> different way?On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:55 AM Sergey Senozhatsky
I suggest to go with backporting Steven's patchset. We do not have
anything better at the moment.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists