linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Mark expected switch fall-throughs and fix missing break

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a1b9b68a-ca94-f02f-4a87-bbd46782c41c@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Oct 2018 10:36:19 -0400
From:   Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@...il.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Mark expected switch fall-throughs and fix missing
 break

On 10/22/18 7:49 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, this patchset aims
> to mark multiple switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Also, the second patch in this series fixes a missing break in switch.

Enabling that sounds like a great way to inflict pain and suffering.

Not a big deal to put that in the code, the second patch looks fine though.

Jes