[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a1b4cd27-858c-de53-8ae2-b1aee689475f@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:33:23 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/17] ARM: dts: tegra20: harmony: Setup voltage
regulators for DVFS
On 10/21/18 2:54 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Set min/max regulators voltage and add CPU node that hooks up CPU with
> voltage regulators.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-harmony.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra20-harmony.dts
> - sm0 {
> + core_vdd_reg: sm0 {
> regulator-name = "vdd_sm0,vdd_core";
> - regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
> - regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
> + regulator-coupled-with = <&rtc_vdd_reg>;
> + regulator-coupled-max-spread = <150000>;
> regulator-always-on;
> };
How do you know for sure that these increased ranges are safe (high end)
and stable (low end) for this particular board? IIRC the safe/legal
range depends on the chip SKU, and to be honest I have no idea which SKU
is present on Harmony... For public boards like Colibri I imagine
there's enough information out there to tell what will work, but maybe
not our internal boards like Harmony, unless you checked our ancient
downstream kernels?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists