[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14503a22-403e-3e39-cfd5-0b7a2f299986@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:48:51 -0700
From: Enke Chen <enkechen@...co.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>, deller@....de,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
christian@...uner.io, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Dave.Martin@....com,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
guro@...com, Marcos Souza <marcos.souza.org@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux@...inikbrodowski.net,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Victor Kamensky <kamensky@...co.com>,
xe-linux-external@...co.com, sstrogin@...co.com,
Enke Chen <enkechen@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification
Jann,
Thanks for the feedback. I will post a revised patch shortly.
On the related topic of "pdeath_signal", there are several inconsistencies
by preserving the flag across execve(2). The flag is cleared under several
conditions in different places. I will start a separate thread to see if
it can still be cleaned up.
PR_SET_PDEATHSIG (since Linux 2.1.57)
Set the parent death signal of the calling process to arg2
(either a signal value in the range 1..maxsig, or 0 to clear).
This is the signal that the calling process will get when its
parent dies. This value is cleared for the child of a fork(2)
and (since Linux 2.4.36 / 2.6.23) when executing a set-user-ID
or set-group-ID binary, or a binary that has associated
capabilities (see capabilities(7)). This value is preserved
across execve(2).
-- Enke
On 10/22/18 8:40 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 1:01 AM Enke Chen <enkechen@...co.com> wrote:
>> Regarding the security considerations, it seems simpler and more secure to
>> just clear the "pre-coredump signal" cross execve(2), and let the new program
>> decide for itself. What do you think?
>
> I don't have a problem with these semantics.
>
> I could imagine someone being unhappy about the theoretical race
> window if they want to perform an in-place reexecution of a running
> service, but I don't know whether anyone actually cares about that.
>
>> Changes to prctl(2):
>>
>> DESCRIPTION
>>
>> PR_SET_PREDUMP_SIG (since Linux 4.20.x)
>> This allows the calling process to receive a signal (arg2,
>> if nonzero) from a child process prior to the coredump of
>> the child process. arg2 must be SIGUSR1, or SIGUSR2, or
>> SIGCHLD, or 0 (for clear).
>>
>> When SIGCHLD is specified, the signal code is set to
>> CLD_PREDUMP in such an SIGCHLD signal.
>>
>> The value of the pre-coredump signal is cleared across
>> execve(2), or for the child of a fork(2).
>>
>> PR_GET_PREDUMP_SIG (since Linux 4.20.x)
>> Return the current value of the pre-coredump signal for the
>> calling process, in the location pointed to by (int *) arg2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists