[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181022073646.GM1885@192.168.1.4>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:36:46 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: dyoung@...hat.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"msys.mizuma@...il.com" <msys.mizuma@...il.com>,
"Indoh, Takao" <indou.takao@...itsu.com>,
"Cao, Jin" <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] x86/boot: Add get_acpi_rsdp() to parse RSDP in
cmdlien from kexec
On 10/22/18 at 03:30pm, Chao Fan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 02:06:13PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> >On 10/22/18 at 05:30am, Fan, Chao wrote:
> >> >> +static void get_acpi_rsdp(acpi_physical_address *rsdp_addr)
> >> >> +{
> >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> >> >> + unsigned long long res;
> >> >> + int len = 0;
> >> >> + char *val;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + val = malloc(20);
> >> >
> >> >Why is the length 20? Defined a macro?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Not a calculation, if it's enough to store the address, that will be OK.
> >
> >Sorry, I didn't catch. It's 16 in setup_acpi_rsdp() of
> >drivers/acpi/osl.c . What does 'that' mean?
>
> The second parameter of kstrtoull(), the 16 you mentioned means
> hexadecimal, not the length.
Yes, you are right.
> I checked my host and guest, the value are ACPI20=0xbfbfa014, ACPI20=0xdb807000.
> The length of memory is 8. Well the max memory address is 16, add
> "0x" and '\0' is 19. So I set it as 20.
> I am not sure whether 8 is enough for the address, if OK, 11 will
> be enough, or 19 is OK.
I am fine with 20. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists