linux-kernel - Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a401f973508662fa241b1410e08480884baca606.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:10:40 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8

On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 23:05 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/22/18 9:16 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > As James Bottomley has suggested multiple times,
> > I'd much rather kernel development use the debian
> > code of conduct verbatim than even this modified one.
> > 
> > https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
> 
> Yes, that and the Samba URL are good.
> 
> And it's disappointing how patches from James are acked or reviewed on the
> mailing lists and then mostly ignored (until the maintainer summit) while
> other patches are merged into the mainline git tree.
> 
> It seems to be very one-sided.

Perhaps an apt description is 'cabal like'.