[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3d96be69-e50c-187e-7d3a-75eec63d2be0@rock-chips.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 15:21:50 +0800
From: tony <tony.xie@...k-chips.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: heiko@...ech.de, broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chenjh@...k-chips.com,
xsf@...k-chips.com, zhangqing@...k-chips.com,
huangtao@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] mfd: rk808: Add RK817 and RK809 support
在 2018/10/23 14:26, Lee Jones 写道:
>>>> The rk809 and rk817 are a Power Management IC (PMIC) for multimedia
>>>> and handheld devices. It contains the following components:
>>>>
>>>> - Regulators
>>>> - RTC
>>>> - Clocking
>>>>
>>>> Both RK809 and RK817 chips are using a similar register map,
>>>> so we can reuse the RTC and Clocking and regulators functionality.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Xie <tony.xie@...k-chips.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 6 +-
>>>> drivers/mfd/rk808.c | 218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> include/linux/mfd/rk808.h | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> kernel/reboot.c | 1 +
>>>> 4 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> [...]
>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/reboot.c b/kernel/reboot.c
>>>> index e4ced88..83810d7 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/reboot.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
>>>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>>>> */
>>>> void (*pm_power_off_prepare)(void);
>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pm_power_off_prepare);
>>> Why do you need this where no other driver in the kernel does?
>> There is a gpio_slp pin for RK809 and RK817,this pin has reset、power
>> down and sleep functions,so
>> when system is going to power down, this pin is needed to switch to
>> power down function,and then we just only control
>> this pin to high to power down the system in atf at last。
> There are other PM call-backs that you can use for this. There
> shouldn't be any requirement to export and call functions at this
> level directly.
I will use a shutdown call-backs from syscore to implement it.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists