[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181023125928.GC20085@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 05:59:28 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
robin@...tonic.nl, stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, hjc@...k-chips.com,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, airlied@...ux.ie,
robin.murphy@....com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, treding@...dia.com,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>, tchibo@...gle.com,
riel@...hat.com, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, ak@...ux.intel.com,
rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux@...inikbrodowski.net,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, cpandya@...eaurora.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
mcgrof@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: Introduce new function vm_insert_kmem_page
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 06:03:42PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:54 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 05:44:32PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > > Instruction from Matthew Wilcox who is supervising the entire vm_fault_t
> > > migration work :-)
> >
> > Hang on. That was for the initial vm_fault_t conversion in which each
> > step was clearly an improvement. What you're looking at now is far
> > from that.
>
> Ok. But my understanding was, the approach of vm_insert_range comes
> into discussion as part of converting vm_insert_page into vmf_insert_page
> which is still part of original vm_fault_t conversion discussion. No ?
No. The initial part (converting all page fault methods to vm_fault_t)
is done. What remains undone (looking at akpm's tree) is changing the
typedef of vm_fault_t from int to unsigned int. That will prevent new
page fault handlers with the wrong type from being added.
I don't necessarily want to get rid of vm_insert_page(). Maybe it will
make sense to do that, and maybe not. What I do want to see is thought,
and not "Matthew told me to do it", when I didn't.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists