lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181023151616.78193-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Oct 2018 17:16:16 +0200
From:   Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        acme@...nel.org
Cc:     brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
        heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf/stat: Handle different PMU names with common prefix

On s390 the CPU Measurement Facility for counters now supports
2 PMUs named cpum_cf (CPU Measurement Facility for counters) and
cpum_cf_diag (CPU Measurement Facility for diagnostic counters)
for one and the same CPU.

Running command

 [root@...lp76 perf]# ./perf stat -e tx_c_tend \
	 -- ~/mytests/cf-tx-events 1

 Measuring transactions
 TX_C_TABORT_NO_SPECIAL: 0 expected:0
 TX_C_TABORT_SPECIAL: 0 expected:0
 TX_C_TEND: 1 expected:1
 TX_NC_TABORT: 11 expected:11
 TX_NC_TEND: 1 expected:1

 Performance counter stats for '/root/mytests/cf-tx-events 1':

  2      tx_c_tend

      0.002120091 seconds time elapsed

      0.000121000 seconds user
      0.002127000 seconds sys

 [root@...lp76 perf]#

displays output which is unexpected (and wrong):

  2      tx_c_tend

The test program definitely triggers only one transaction, as shown
in line 'TX_C_TEND: 1 expected:1'.

This is caused by the following call sequence:

pmu_lookup() scans and installs a PMU.
+--> pmu_aliases() parses all aliases in directory
		.../<pmu-name>/events/* which are file names.
     +--> pmu_aliases_parse() Read each file in directory and create
                      an new alias entry. This is done with
          +--> perf_pmu__new_alias() and
	       +--> __perf_pmu__new_alias() which also check for
	                   identical alias names.

After pmu_aliases() returns, a complete list of event names
for this pmu has been created. Now function

pmu_add_cpu_aliases()   is called to add the events listed in the json
|                       files to the alias list of the cpu.
+--> perf_pmu__find_map()  Returns a pointer to the json events.

Now function pmu_add_cpu_aliases() scans through all events listed
in the JSON files for this CPU.
Each json event pmu name is compared with the current PMU being
built up and if they mismatch, the json event is added to the
current PMUs alias list.
To avoid duplicate entries the following comparison is done:

	if (!is_arm_pmu_core(name)) {
	     pname = pe->pmu ? pe->pmu : "cpu";
	     if (strncmp(pname, name, strlen(pname)))
		     continue;
     }

The culprit is the strncmp() function.

Using current s390 PMU naming, the first PMU is 'cpum_cf'
and a long list of events is added, among them 'tx_c_tend'

When the second PMU named 'cpum_cf_diag' is added, only one event
named 'CF_DIAG' is added by the pmu_aliases()  function.

Now function pmu_add_cpu_aliases() is invoked for PMU 'cpum_cf_diag'.
Since the CPUID string is the same for both PMUs, json file events
for PMU named 'cpum_cf' are added to the PMU 'cpm_cf_diag'

This happens because the strncmp() actually compares:

     strncmp("cpum_cf", "cpum_cf_diag", 6);

The first parameter is the pmu name taken from the event in
the json file. The second parameter is the pmu name of the PMU
currently being built.
They are different, but the length of the compare only tests the
common prefix and this returns 0(true) when it should return false.

Now all events for PMU cpum_cf are added to the alias list for pmu
cpum_cf_diag.

Later on in function parse_events_add_pmu() the event 'tx_c_end' is
searched in all available PMUs and found twice, adding it two
times to the evsel_list global variable which is the root
of all events. This results in a counter value of 2 instead
of 1.

Output with this patch:

 [root@...lp76 perf]# ./perf stat -e tx_c_tend \
			-- ~/mytests/cf-tx-events 1
 Measuring transactions
 TX_C_TABORT_NO_SPECIAL: 0 expected:0
 TX_C_TABORT_SPECIAL: 0 expected:0
 TX_C_TEND: 1 expected:1
 TX_NC_TABORT: 11 expected:11
 TX_NC_TEND: 1 expected:1

 Performance counter stats for '/root/mytests/cf-tx-events 1':

                  1      tx_c_tend

      0.001815365 seconds time elapsed

      0.000123000 seconds user
      0.001756000 seconds sys

 [root@...lp76 perf]#

Fixes: 292c34c10249 ("perf pmu: Fix core PMU alias list for X86 platform")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.18+
---
 tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
index 7799788f662f..7e49baad304d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
 
 		if (!is_arm_pmu_core(name)) {
 			pname = pe->pmu ? pe->pmu : "cpu";
-			if (strncmp(pname, name, strlen(pname)))
+			if (strcmp(pname, name))
 				continue;
 		}
 
-- 
2.14.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ