lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 Oct 2018 21:30:14 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Cc:     Dan O'Donovan <dan@...tex.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@...tex.com>,
        Javier Arteaga <javier@...tex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] leds: upboard: Add LED support

On Tue 2018-10-23 21:09:54, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 10/23/2018 08:54 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> >>> +	led->field = devm_regmap_field_alloc(dev, regmap, conf);
> >>> +	if (IS_ERR(led->field))
> >>> +		return PTR_ERR(led->field);
> >>> +
> >>> +	led->cdev.max_brightness = 1;
> >>
> >> s/1/LED_ON/
> > 
> > Actually, I prefer constant 1 here, as it makes it immediately obvious
> > this supports just 0/1.
> > 
> > Yes, LED_ON is also 1, but I had to grep the header files for
> > that... (I thought it was 255).
> 
> If we have the enum for that, let's use it.
> Here's the commit message of the patch adding LED_ON - it should
> be somehow familiar to you - see the ack.

Well .. brightness = LED_ON; is good usage. max_brightness = LED_ON is
IMO less readable than max_brightness = 1.

Looking at situation again... Having LED_ON and LED_FULL, with some
leds having max brightness of 1023, so LED_FULL is not really full
brightness any more... Maybe it is time to get rid of the enum, and
make it plain int. It does not really enumarate anything, and it does
not help readability, either.
								Pavel


> commit 4e552c8cb5bc9137e67e035bab8df6dddbca7384
> Author: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
> Date:   Thu Jan 5 11:34:12 2017 +0900
> 
>     leds: add LED_ON brightness as boolean value
> 
>     Some devices do not handle the led brightness or simply don't
>     care about it. Conceptually said devices want to just switch on
>     or off the led. It is useless in this case to have a 255 range
>     of brightness, while just having an LED_ON and LED_OFF improves
>     the boolean meaning of the led status.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
>     Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
>     Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
> 
> 

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ