linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 01/10] fs: common implementation of file type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181024082134.GA14565@pathfinder>
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:21:34 +0100
From:   Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
To:     Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 01/10] fs: common implementation of file type

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 09:16:20AM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:19 PM Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Many file systems use a copy&paste implementation
> > of dirent to on-disk file type conversions.
> >
> > Create a common implementation to be used by file systems
> > with some useful conversion helpers to reduce open coded
> > file type conversions in file system code.
> >
> > Original patch written by Amir Goldstein.
> 
> Looks good.
> I guess you used 'git apply' or just 'patch'
> What you usually do when applying someone else mostly unchanged
> patches is use 'git am -s -3' so you preserve the original author and
> original commit message including the Signed-of-by line.
> You can edit your patch by hand to change the From: line to change the
> author and add
> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> (you sign below me as you changed the patch last)
> 

Dear Amir,

Yes, I applied each patch manually to my tree, fixed it up where needed,
then after rebuilding and testing each one I committed it and regenerated
each patch. Thank you very much for your advice, I will take it into
account and make the necessary changes. In the meantime, do I add other
tags in the order they are received also (such as Reviewed-by:) and am
I safe to add these in when I re-send the patches with the changes you
and others have suggested (or would that offend people that have
offered the tags)?

Regards,
Phil