linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] add generic builtin command line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:07:32 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Maksym Kokhan <maksym.kokhan@...ballogic.com>
Cc:     Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Daniel Walker <danielwa@...co.com>,
        Andrii Bordunov <aborduno@...co.com>,
        Ruslan Bilovol <rbilovol@...co.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] add generic builtin command line

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +0300, Maksym Kokhan wrote:
> Do you mean, that you haven't seen patch for ARM, which I sent on
> September 27 along with cover and patch 1? It is strange, because
> you was the one from recipients. If so, you can see this patch here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/992779/

It seems that I have received patch 5, _but_ it's not threaded with
the cover message and patch 1.  With 50k messages in my inbox, and 3k
messages since you sent the series, it's virtually impossible to find
it (I only found it by looking at my mail server logs from September
to find the subject, and then searching my mailbox for that subject.)

This is unnecessarily difficult.

> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:48 PM Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 05:43:18PM +0300, Maksym Kokhan wrote:
> > > We still have no response to patches for x86, arm, arm64 and powerpc.
> > > Is current generic command line implementation appropriate for these
> > > architectures?
> > > Is it possible to merge these patches in the current form (for x86,
> > > arm, arm64 and powerpc)?
> >
> > You may wish to consider your recipients - I seem to only have received
> > the cover and patch 1 (which doesn't include any ARM specific bits).
> > It may be that you're not getting responses because people haven't seen
> > your patches.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
> > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up