linux-kernel - Re: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in string (2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxi84ywY4BXJ1ZYDOQHZhbYr+GjJTrkGZvBbH4XUqR0nPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:35:21 +0300
From:   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        syzbot+376cea2b0ef340db3dd4@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
        overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Mark Fasheh <mark@...heh.com>
Subject: Re: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds Read in string (2)

> > diff --git a/fs/lockd/host.c b/fs/lockd/host.c
> > index d35cd6be0675..93fb7cf0b92b 100644
> > --- a/fs/lockd/host.c
> > +++ b/fs/lockd/host.c
> > @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ struct nlm_host *nlmsvc_lookup_host(const struct
> > svc_rqst *rqstp,
> >         };
> >         struct lockd_net *ln = net_generic(net, lockd_net_id);
> >
> > -       dprintk("lockd: %s(host='%*s', vers=%u, proto=%s)\n", __func__,
> > +       dprintk("lockd: %s(host='%.*s', vers=%u, proto=%s)\n", __func__,
> >                         (int)hostname_len, hostname, rqstp->rq_vers,
> >                         (rqstp->rq_prot == IPPROTO_UDP ? "udp" : "tcp"));
> >
>
> Why wasn't this one applied?  It looks correct to me.  The rest seem to
> have been fixed already.
>

I did not send this patch to Jeff.
Jeff was CC'ed on the patch I sent to Miklos
and Miklos decided to only take the overlayfs bits:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-unionfs&m=153847248625015&w=2

So I guess it has fallen between the cracks.
Feel free to send a patch to Jeff.

Thanks,
Amir.